SNIPPETS FROM JOURNAL WATCH

Lancet 19 Jun 2010 Vol 375
2161 Golly - here's something you don't often see in The Lancet: a trial puffing a new drug for angina which costs about £20 per year. Nor is it subsidised and ghost-written by the drug's manufacturers, who have probably long ago lost interest in it. Because the drug is our old friend allopurinol, at 600mg daily, used to improve exercise tolerance in ischaemic heart disease as opposed to preventing gout. It's a very small short-term trial, but there seems to be no reason not to give the drug a go - and quite a few reasons to believe that it may be a good thing for the strained myocardium (see editorial on p.2126).
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(10)60391-1/abstract

JAMA 9 Jun 2010 Vol 303
2280 "Does This Patient Have a Haemorrhagic Stroke?" asks the latest in The Rational Clinical Examination Series. "How should I know, I haven't seen the scan" might be the usual answer, and it also turns out to be the correct one. Features like coma, headache, neck stiffness and high blood pressure all make haemorrhage a bit more likely, but the only way to know with sufficient certainty is by putting the patient through a CT scanner, preferably within the window for thrombolysis if the stroke turns out to be ischaemic. This is confirmed by 19 prospectively studies, meticulously analysed here.
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/303/22/2280

NEJM 10 Jun 2010 Vol 362
2155 This study is based on the Kaiser Permanente insured population of California and it tells a pretty amazing tale - ST elevation myocardial infarction has fallen by 62% in the last decade. Interestingly the incidence of non-ST elevation MI went up between 2002 and 2004 as troponin assays became widely adopted as the diagnostic gold standard, but even taking this into account, the incidence of any MI has gone down by a third. During this time, Californians became a bit fatter, did slightly more exercise, were banned from smoking in public places, and were prescribed more statins, beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors. We are not told if they drank more of their sometimes passable wines.
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/362/23/2155

Lancet 12 Jun 2010 Vol 375
2073 From the point of view of someone fixated on the cardiovascular system, the body consists of a central pump supplying blood to various tufts - lung-tufts to oxygenate it, gut-tufts to feed it and kidney tufts to get rid of waste products, and so on. I can see that for some the kidney is an interesting organ, but it's essentially a dangling footnote to the business of assessing cardiovascular risk, and delicious when prepared correctly. Now assessing risk (or prognosis) is itself of little importance unless you can use it to guide interventions to reduce risk. All of which makes it very frustrating to wade through a paper like this which pools data from 14 studies (over 100 000 individuals) to derive risk tables for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality graded by eGFR and albuminuria, independently of blood pressure, cholesterol and smoking. There seems to be a definite association which, surprisingly, is slightly U-shaped when you combine the two factors. So was QOF right to make us identify and check out everyone with an eGFR under 60? That's another question entirely, which depends on how much these factors contribute to total CV risk, and what we can do about it.
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(10)60674-5/abstract

JAMA 2 Jun 2010 Vol 303
2141 Acute heart failure is regarded by most members of the public as synonymous with death, and indeed a proportion of patients admitted to hospital with HF do die within 30 days, but this stands at barely more than one in ten, and has hardly changed between 1993 and 2006, dropping from 12.8% to 10.7%. During that time, nearly 7 million Americans covered by Medicare have been to hospital with acute HF, and very little else has changed either: they get discharged a bit sooner, and readmitted slightly more often. A huge, meticulous, well-described outcomes study of this kind inevitably has one looking for Harlan Krumholz; yes, there he is.
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/303/21/2141

2148 The heart failure figures are rather disappointing, whichever way you spin them; but one definite way to reduce HF is to save myocardium by timely reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. We know this from many interventional trials, of course, but given the immense organisational effort that has gone into providing access to immediate percutaneous intervention for MI, it is nice to have observational evidence from a large population too. Voici QuÃÆ'Ã" '©bec. In 2006-7, nearly 80% of quÃÆ'Ã" '©bÃÆ'Ã" '©cois with ST elevation MI received PCI, but in 68% of cases this occurred after more than 90 minutes. If you look at a map of Canada, you will see why: the province is more than twice the size of France and stretches up and beyond the Arctic Circle. Of those who received thrombolysis, 54% got it later than the ideal 30 minutes. The mortality figures following the two modes of treatment are remarkably similar, but outcomes such as recurrent MI and the need for bypass grafting favour PCI. By contrast, the treatment within the ideal window halves your chance of death within 30 days.
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/303/21/2148

BMJ 5 Jun 2010 Vol 340
1231 The star of this week's BMJ is Julia Hippisley-Cox, professor of primary care in Nottingham, who has used the EMIS database of British general practices to derive an improved cardiovascular risk score (QRISK) and has also (see below) worked out from it what the true risks and benefits of statins are in UK primary care. We are lucky to have such studies to refine our practice, since they apply directly to the population we treat. As she has been working on the two versions of QRISK, Gary Collins and Doug Altman have been dogging her footsteps, and here they publish an independent and external validation of QRISK2. Use it with confidence in British general practice - you won't get a better Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval than this.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/may13_2/c2442

1233 Allan Struthers has done much of the basic work on BNP and the renin-angiotensin pathway. The end product of this pathway is aldosterone, and the Dundee-led RALES trial published in 1999 showed that by blocking it with spironolactone in patients with chronic heart failure, you could improve outcomes even if they were on other RAS-inhibiting treatments. So off I went and gave some to a few of my HF patients, noting that the RALES trial encountered few problems with hyperkalaemia. I duly checked the electrolytes of one patient a couple of weeks later and sent him straight to hospital with a potassium of 6.8. This alarming event proved to be common enough in Canada, too, according to a paper which appeared in the New England Journal in 2004. But here Allan Struthers et al rebut their critics with data from Tayside, proving that your canny Scots GP can use sprironolactone with perfect safety, laddie, aye perfect safety. As the great poet of the Tay might have put it :Physicians of England and Canada kill their patients with hyperkalaemia; But by the banks of the silvery Tay our doctors behave much more seemlier. W. McGonagall op posth.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/may18_2/c1768